And so for Question 5. I shall reiterate the rules, as I would love to do some interviewing myself. Those that have already requested - I'll send you your questions very soon.
•Leave me a comment requesting an interview.
•I will e-mail you five questions. I get to pick the questions.•You then answer the questions on your blog.
•You should also post these rules along with an offer to interview anyone else who e-mails you wanting to be interviewed. •Anyone who asks to be interviewed should be sent 5 questions to answer on their blog.
•It would be nice if the questions were individualized for each blogger.
5. If you were to 'take up' a religion, which one would appeal to you most of all?
Those American gospel choir folk seem to enjoy themselves, but at what cost? AT WHAT COST, EH?!
Bhuddism apparantly isn't all that bad, but I've never been interested enough to look into it; from an outsider view, it seems so very boring. The old Greek gods have always fascinated me, and while belief in them would probably feel like a constant cry for mercy, their self-interested affairs and exploits always looked far more interesting, and certainly more believable than anything my casual protestant Christian upbringing ever showed me. Alas, that religion is dead and gone. Decisions, decisions.
If I were to decide now that I needed religion - that is to say, if for some incomprehensible reason, perhaps following a tragic accident in which my frontal lobe is toasted, destroying all logic functions, but thankfully leaving my capacity for creative thought unharmed - I would hope I'd still have the good sense to avoid Christianity, which says I'm fucked if I can't lead an entirely good life. Say I live a charitable life, I'm good to my neighbours, etcetera etcetera but as much as I've been fighting it, and God knows I should be able to, since it's a choice an' all, I realise I'm gay and start bumming said neighbour... Shit. Hell it is. Really? All or nothing? You mean I can't pick and choose what the Bible (in all its Word Of God circular reasoning bullshit) is saying? The Pope says no, and if you disagree, then what, the Bible, in part at least, is wrong? Uh.
No, I'd go for Hinduism, definitely. I like their style, I could do the whole complete holy life thing, or I could just live my life as I please (in which case, I'm not going to do anything immoral anyway) and my reward after life will be calculated accordingly. Seems fair enough. Atheism, to an extent, is joyfully compatible too, seeing as God can be interpreted as being in all things (but not in that omnipotent, working through all things way), which to all practical purposes makes God fairly irrelevant, and more of a metaphor for the whole 'circle of life' conservation of energy sort of thing.
The notion of karma doesn't really bother me at all, being far less intrusive than any shitty superstitions I've heard of, and in any case seems remarkably close to 'wishful thinking' (which is just as useful and unuseful in varying measures), which I'm already guilty of anyhow.
The cow thing - seeing as they respect them, as opposed to worshipping them as some think - doesn't seem all that silly.
It's the reincarnation and implication of a soul that would be difficult to accept if it weren't for that injury to the frontal lobe. Let's say I just accept the soul thing, believing that my everlasting soul escapes my body at death and becomes part of the rest of nature and all that. Right, sorted - an idea so abstract that it might as well be irrelevant (the concept seems no different to me than an Atheist's concept of inexistence). But reincarnation just doesn't make sense to me at all. Firstly, restricting it to sentient beings, the numbers don't add up - there are more sentient beings than ever before, to the point that the majority have entirely new souls. However, it's not restricted to sentient beings - if I'm really unlucky/lucky, I'll come back as a tree or something. Ok, let's say I accept that. In my life as a tree though, how can a tree live either a good or bad life? It can't; it just... is. Perhaps its goodness comes from its uses (the tree provides shelter for a poor little homeless orphan in a rain storm for instance), but I never chose to do that; if karma's tallying up what I have no say in anyway, why bother at all?
Well, thanks to my fried frontal lobe, I needn't worry about such things, so a Hindu I would become. Besides it seeming the least offending of religions, it is also the most appealing to me (one doesn't necessarily infer the other). Hinduism seems to have by far a more positive relationship with the cultures and societies that host it than Christianity ever does with ours.